Go to the main content of the page.
Logo, Maryland State Department of Education
MCAP, Maryland Comprehensive Assessment Program

This page shows questions in the Math 4 Reasoning public release module at MSDE. 4th Grade Math
"Math 4 Reasoning"

Select from the list to explore. Read any associated passages and then interact with the questions here.

This is a multiple choice question that allows you to select several options.

A student rounded 3872 to the nearest hundred and to the nearest thousand. The student noticed that the results, 3900 and 4000, were not equal. The student claimed that the two results will never be equal when a number is rounded to the nearest hundred and to the nearest thousand.

Which two numbers could be used to show that the student’s claim is incorrect?

Select the two correct answers.

i2

Correcti1

May not have recognized that the results would be 43 ,600 and 44 ,000 i3

May not have recognized that the results would be 67 ,300 and 67 ,000 i4

May not have recognized that the results would be 72 ,400 and 72 ,000

This is a test question that allows you to enter extended text in your response.

A train museum has a toy train that goes around the entire museum. The train goes around 10 times in 2 hours.

A student calculated the amount of time it takes for the train to go around 1 time. The work is shown.

The figure shows the following work written by the student: 2 hours divided by 10, equals 0.2 hour. 0.2 is the same as 0.20, so it takes 20 minutes for the train to go around 1 time.

The student’s work is incorrect.

  • Explain any errors in the student’s work.
  • Explain how to correct the student’s work and find the amount of time it takes for the train to go around the museum 1 time.

Enter your answer and your work or explanation in the space provided. You may also use the drawing tool to help explain or support your answer.

Drawing Box

There is no alt-text. (37 files were searched.)

Holistic Rubric for 3-Point Reasoning Constructed Response Items

Sample Top Score Response

The student divided correctly, but 0.20 hour is not the same as 20 minutes.

0.20 hour is 2 10 of an hour and 20 minutes is 1 3 of an hour.

Before dividing by 10 , the student could have changed 2 hours to 120 minutes.

120 minutes ÷ 10 = 12 minutes.

So it takes 12 minutes for the train to go around the museum 1 time.

Points

Sample Characteristics

3 Points

A three-point response for reasoning items provides evidence of correct, complete, and appropriate mathematical reasoning.

The response may:

  • be clear and well developed with logical reasoning communicated by the use of precise and appropriate representations, symbols, drawings, or mathematical vocabulary.
  • contain minor flaws that do not detract from the correct reasoning or demonstration of a thorough understanding.

2 Points

A two-point response for reasoning items provides evidence of partially correct mathematical reasoning.

The response may:

  • display an incomplete reasoning process.
  • contain minor flaws that detract from the correct reasoning or demonstration of a thorough understanding.

1 Point

A one-point response for reasoning items provides limited evidence of correct mathematical reasoning.

The response may:

  • demonstrate the beginning of a valid chain of reasoning.
  • reflect a lack of essential understanding of the underlying mathematical concepts.
  • contain the correct solution, but work is limited or missing.
  • contain errors in the fundamental mathematical procedures or reasoning.
  • contain omissions or irregularities that lead to an inadequate solution.

0 Point

A zero-point response is completely incorrect, incoherent or irrelevant.

This is a question with 3 parts, including a question with drop-down menus from which you must select an option to fill in the blank.

A student used these models to compare the fractions 712 and 68. The student incorrectly claimed that 712>68 because more sections are shaded in the model that represents the fraction 712 than in the model that represents the fraction 68.

The figure shows the expression, seven twelfths, is greater than, six eighths, under two rectangular models of equal size. The model above the fraction seven twelfths, is divided into 12 equal parts, with 7 parts shay did, and 5 parts un shay did. The model above the fraction six eighths, is divided into 8 equal parts, with 6 parts shay did, and 2 parts un shay did.

Explain why the student’s claim is incorrect.

Select from the drop-down menus to correctly complete the sentences.

The claim is incorrect because the student only compared the    . The student should have compared the number of    and the    in each model.

This is a multiple choice question that allows you to select several options.

This is a test question that allows you to enter extended text in your response.

A model is shown.

The figure shows a model that is a rectangle, divided into four parts. On the top side, the left part is labeled, 70, and the right part is labeled, 8. On the left side, the top part is labeled, 50, and the bottom part is labeled, 4.

Explain how the model could be used to find the result of 54×78. Then find the result of 54×78.

Enter your answer and your explanation in the space provided. You may also use the drawing tool to help explain or support your answer.

Drawing Box

There is no alt-text. (37 files were searched.)

Holistic Rubric for 3-Point Reasoning Constructed Response Items

Points

Sample Characteristics

3 Points

A three-point response for reasoning items provides evidence of correct, complete, and appropriate mathematical reasoning.

The response may:

  • be clear and well developed with logical reasoning communicated by the use of precise and appropriate representations, symbols, drawings, or mathematical vocabulary.
  • contain minor flaws that do not detract from the correct reasoning or demonstration of a thorough understanding.

2 Points

A two-point response for reasoning items provides evidence of partially correct mathematical reasoning.

The response may:

  • display an incomplete reasoning process.
  • contain minor flaws that detract from the correct reasoning or demonstration of a thorough understanding.

1 Point

A one-point response for reasoning items provides limited evidence of correct mathematical reasoning.

The response may:

  • demonstrate the beginning of a valid chain of reasoning.
  • reflect a lack of essential understanding of the underlying mathematical concepts.
  • contain the correct solution, but work is limited or missing.
  • contain errors in the fundamental mathematical procedures or reasoning.
  • contain omissions or irregularities that lead to an inadequate solution.

0 Point

A zero-point response is completely incorrect, incoherent or irrelevant.

This is a multiple choice question that allows you to select only one option.

A student added 310 and 2100 and got a result of 5100 . The student’s work is shown.

Step 1 (replace 310 with an equivalent fraction): 310+2100=3100+2100

Step 2 (combine fractions) :3100+2100=3+2100

Step 3 (add numerators) :3+2100=5100

Which statement is true about the student’s work and answer?

i3

Correcti1

May have thought that the work and answer are correct.i2

May have thought that the common denominator is found by adding the denominators.i4

May have thought that the common denominators should be added.